<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BTJD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://btjd.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://btjd.com</link>
	<description>A Premier Utah Law Firm Specializing in Business Law, Mergers and Acquisitions, Venture Capital, Real Estate, and Commercial Litigation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 15:31:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Utah Angel Investor Law &#124; Qualified Small Business Stock Exclusion</title>
		<link>http://btjd.com/2011/08/utah-angel-investor-law-qualified-small-business-stock-exclusion/</link>
		<comments>http://btjd.com/2011/08/utah-angel-investor-law-qualified-small-business-stock-exclusion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 19:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jrichards</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Angel Investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://btjd.com/?p=984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To help encourage investment in small businesses, Congress enacted Section 1202 of the Internal Revenue Code which provides relief to investors who risk their funds in small business ventures.  Specifically, investors are able to exclude a portion of the gain realized on the sale of qualified small business stock that meets the requirements of Section<a href="http://btjd.com/2011/08/utah-angel-investor-law-qualified-small-business-stock-exclusion/" class="read-more">Continue Reading</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To help encourage investment in small businesses, Congress enacted Section 1202 of the Internal Revenue Code which provides relief to investors who risk their funds in small business ventures.  Specifically, investors are able to exclude a portion of the gain realized on the sale of qualified small business stock that meets the requirements of Section 1202.  This exclusion, enhanced by the recently passed Tax Relief Act of 2010, can provide strong incentives to investors and can be a very powerful tool to entrepreneurs and small companies as they seek capital for their emerging businesses.  The following briefly summarizes the main provisions of the small business stock exclusion.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><em><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Exclusion Amount</span></em></p>
<p>The IRS allows non-corporate taxpayers to partially exclude from gross income the sale or exchange of qualified small business stock that is held for longer than five years.  Specifically, a non-corporate investor may recognize the following exclusions from gross income depending on what type of stock they obtained and when they purchased the stock:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul>
<li>50% exclusion for all qualified small business stock—IRC § 1202(a)(1);</li>
<li>60% exclusion for qualified small business stock sold in an empowerment zone—IRC §1202(a)(2);</li>
<li>75% exclusion for qualified small business stock acquired between February 17, 2009 to September 27, 2010—IRC §1202(a)(3); or</li>
<li>100% exclusion for qualified small business stock acquired between September 28, 2010 and January 1, 2012—IRC §1202(a)(4).</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><em><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Cumulative Limit</span></em></p>
<p>A single issuer is limited in the gain that he or she may exclude from their gross income from the sale of qualified small business stock.  Specifically, a single issuer’s total exclusion is limited, for any given year, to the greater of:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul>
<li>$10 million reduced by the aggregate amount of eligible gain taken in prior years; or</li>
<li>10 times the taxpayer’s adjusted basis in any qualified small business stock disposed of by the taxpayer in the tax year.</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>This limitation is applied on a per taxpayer basis and married taxpayers that file separately may only exclude $5 million per spouse.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><em><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Small Business Stock Qualifications</span></em></p>
<p>To be eligible, small business stock must be (i) issued after August 10, 1993; (ii) issued by a C-corporation (other than a mutual fund, cooperative, or other pass-through corporation); and (iii) acquired by the taxpayer at its original issue for consideration (note: qualified stock, acquired through conversion, that was qualified small business stock in the previous taxpayer’s hands is also qualified stock in the receiving taxpayer’s hands).  Additionally, the C-corporation that issues the stock cannot have more than $50 million in aggregate gross assets immediately before or after the issuance.  Moreover, throughout the holding period of five years, the corporation must use 80% of its assets in the active and productive use of its qualified trade or business.  Professional service organizations (e.g., accounting, architecture, law, etc.) and businesses in the fields of engineering, health, finance, insurance, etc. are not considered qualified trade or business for purposes of Section 1202 and thus ineligible to issue qualified small business stock.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>In summary, although qualified small business stock has several different requirements that require detailed planning, if properly structured, issuing qualified small business stock can help companies attract interested investors since investors may be able to exclude up to 100% of any gain realized from the sale of the qualified small business stock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://btjd.com/2011/08/utah-angel-investor-law-qualified-small-business-stock-exclusion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Utah Mechanic&#8217;s Lien Laws &#124; 2011 Updates &#124; Utah Construction Attorneys</title>
		<link>http://btjd.com/2011/08/utah-mechanics-lien-laws-2011-updates-utah-construction-attorneys/</link>
		<comments>http://btjd.com/2011/08/utah-mechanics-lien-laws-2011-updates-utah-construction-attorneys/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 19:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bjohnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mechanic's Lien Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah Construction Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah Lien Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah Lien Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://btjd.com/?p=978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Utah’s mechanic’s lien laws were changed significantly in the 2011 General Session of the Utah Legislature.  Many of the changes to the lien laws were pushed by the banking and insurance industries and will generally make it more difficult for a contractor or supplier to maintain or enforce its lien rights.  Other changes modified the<a href="http://btjd.com/2011/08/utah-mechanics-lien-laws-2011-updates-utah-construction-attorneys/" class="read-more">Continue Reading</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Utah’s mechanic’s lien laws were changed significantly in the 2011 General Session of the Utah Legislature.  Many of the changes to the lien laws were pushed by the banking and insurance industries and will generally make it more difficult for a contractor or supplier to maintain or enforce its lien rights.  Other changes modified the lien rights of architects, engineers, and others providing preconstruction services.  The changes to the lien rights of architects, engineers and others providing preconstruction services are arguably the only positive development resulting from the changes in the lien laws.  The changes to the lien rights of architects, engineers and others providing preconstruction services are explained after a discussion of: (1) the types of liens that can now be filed, (2) the preliminary notice requirements for construction service liens, and (3) the priority scheme of lien claims versus construction mortgages.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>With the passage of the new lien laws, the familiar terminology of a mechanic’s lien has been replaced in the statutes with the terms “construction service lien” and “preconstruction service lien.”  Effectively, there are now two types of liens that can be filed, construction service liens and preconstruction service liens, which are generally applicable to construction services and preconstruction services, respectively.</p>
<p>Construction services and preconstruction services are defined as follows:</p>
<ul>
<li><em>Construction services </em>“means to furnish labor, service, material, or equipment for the purpose and during the process of constructing, altering, or repairing an improvement” and “includes scheduling, estimating, staking, supervising, managing, materials testing, inspection, observation, and quality control or assurance involved in constructing, altering, or repairing an improvement.”</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><em>Preconstruction services</em> “means to plan or design, or to assist in the planning or design of, an improvement or a proposed improvement,” before construction of the improvement commences, and also includes “consulting, conducting a site investigation or assessment, programming, preconstruction cost or quantity estimating, preconstruction scheduling, performing a preconstruction construction feasibility review, procuring construction services, and preparing a study, report, rendering, model, boundary or topographical survey, plat, map, design, plan, drawing, specification, or contract document.”</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>For contractors entitled to file construction service liens, one of the most significant changes to the lien laws is the implementation of stricter requirements for filing preliminary notices.  For all private projects commencing on or after <em>August 1, 2011</em>, any party that may have a lien right <em>must</em> file a preliminary notice with the State Construction Registry within 20 days of commencing its own work on a project.  A contractor that does not file a preliminary notice with the State Construction Registry will lose the right to file a construction service lien or to make a claim on a payment bond issued for a private project.  Late preliminary notices can still be filed, but they will only be applicable for work performed five days after the late preliminary notice is filed.  This means that your company could file a construction service lien or make a claim on a payment bond but only for work performed five days after the late preliminary notice was filed.  Additionally, if a notice of completion is filed with the State Construction Registry, all preliminary notices must be filed within 10 days of the filing of the notice of completion.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Previously, parties that had a contract <em>directly</em> with the “owner” of the project did <em>not</em> need to file a preliminary notice.  This has been changed and now <em>all</em> parties, regardless of whom they contracted with, will be required to file a preliminary notice on all private projects commencing on or after August 1, 2011.  Additionally, lien claimants were previously exempt from having to file a preliminary notice on private projects if there was not a notice of commencement or valid notice of commencement filed with the State Construction Registry.  Those exceptions no longer exist under the laws that take effect on August 1, 2011.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>In summary, <em>you must timely file your preliminary notices or you will lose your lien rights</em>.  However, if you lose your lien rights on a private project, you will still have your contractual claims against the party that hired you to perform the work.  Other claims for payment may exist depending on the situation, such as Lien Recovery Fund claims and claims against the owner for failure to obtain a payment bond.  Every case is different, so please consult with legal counsel when you have not been paid.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>If you file your own preliminary notices, you should be aware that the information required to be in a preliminary notice has also been substantially modified.  The information required for a preliminary notice is similar to the information required to file a mechanic’s lien and you may need to obtain tax parcel numbers from the County Recorder.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Also, it is strongly suggested that you file your preliminary notices as soon as possible due to changes to the manner in which priority is determined between lien claimants and lenders when a project fails.  Effective for all projects beginning on or after August 1, 2011, priority disputes between construction lien service claimants and lenders will be determined by the date the first preliminary notice on a project is filed with the State Construction Registry.  If the first preliminary notice on a private project is filed before a construction lender records its mortgage or trust deed with the County Recorder, all claimants with valid liens will have priority over the lender, which usually results in the lender having to pay the lien claimants when a project fails.  Filing a preliminary notice as early as possible will increase the likelihood that lenders will have to pay for work performed on a project when it fails or when the owner has not paid.  Contractors who work early on a project will benefit most by filing preliminary notices as soon as possible, as their preliminary notices will most often predate the recording of the construction lender’s mortgage or deed of trust.  Please note that preliminary notices can be filed at any time and you do not need to wait until you commence work to file a preliminary notice.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>As noted, the only potentially advantageous change in the law was the creation of the preconstruction service lien for contractors providing “preconstruction services,” such as architects and engineers.  To maintain a preconstruction service lien, and effective as of May 10, 2011, a potential claimant must first file a “notice of retention” with the State Construction Registry within 20 days of commencing preconstruction services.  Preconstruction service liens may be particularly useful when a lender records a mortgage or trust deed on a project <em>after</em> preconstruction services have commenced.  The preconstruction service lien will have priority over the construction lender if the notice of retention was filed before the lender’s mortgage or trust deed was recorded with the County Recorder.  If this happens, it may force payment to the party providing the preconstruction service.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>If you do not file a preconstruction service lien, it appears these services may be incorporated into a construction service lien if appropriate steps are taken to protect the right to file a construction service lien, including the filing of a preliminary notice.  So, parties performing “preconstruction services” should consider filing both a notice of retention and preliminary notice with the State Construction Registry.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Please note that preliminary notices and notices of retention are not expensive to file.  Wasatch Lien Service expects to charge $15.00 to file either a preliminary notice or notice of retention on a private project and $20.00 for a preliminary notice on a government project.  Wasatch Lien Service’s contact information is as follows:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 90px;"><strong>Jamie Crnich</strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 90px;"><strong>Wasatch Lien Service</strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 90px;"><strong>(801) 278-5436</strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 90px;"><strong>3165 East Millrock Drive, Suite 500</strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 90px;"><strong>Salt Lake City, Utah 84121</strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 90px;">
<p>The deadline for recording a lien has remained the same for construction service liens.  Construction service liens must be recorded within 180 days of final completion of the “original contract” or within 90 days of a notice of completion being filed with the State Construction Registry.  For preconstruction service liens, the lien must be recorded with the County Recorder within 90 days after “completion” of preconstruction services.  If construction has commenced on the project, and you are still performing services, please immediately consult with legal counsel to determine your deadline to record a preconstruction service lien.  The commencement of construction on a project may, in certain circumstances, start the clock ticking on the 90 day deadline to record a preconstruction service lien.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>After you have recorded your construction service lien or preconstruction service lien, if you desire to enforce your lien rights, you must then file a lien foreclosure lawsuit within 180 days of the recording of your lien, or the lien will be automatically void.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>For state government projects, notices of commencement will still be filed with the State Construction Registry.  You will need to file a preliminary notice on state projects in order to maintain payment bond claims.  However, if a notice of commencement is not filed or is invalid, a preliminary notice will not be necessary.  Please note that these state laws do not apply to federal government projects.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Should you have any questions regarding the changes to Utah’s lien laws, please feel free to contact <a title="Ben Johnson - Utah Construction Attorney" href="http://btjd.com/attorneys/benjamin-d-johnson/">Benjamin D. Johnson, Esq.</a> for a consultation at no charge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://btjd.com/2011/08/utah-mechanics-lien-laws-2011-updates-utah-construction-attorneys/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome Brian Hazen</title>
		<link>http://btjd.com/2011/07/welcome-brian-hazen/</link>
		<comments>http://btjd.com/2011/07/welcome-brian-hazen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 18:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jrichards</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://btjd.com/?p=970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BTJD continues to be actively involved in the communities of the various alumni organizations represented by the firm&#8217;s attorneys.  As part of the BYU extern program, BTJD welcomes BYU 1L Brian Hazen as a summer extern to work with the firm&#8217;s corporate section.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTJD continues to be actively involved in the communities of the various alumni organizations represented by the firm&#8217;s attorneys.  As part of the BYU extern program, BTJD welcomes BYU 1L Brian Hazen as a summer extern to work with the firm&#8217;s corporate section.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://btjd.com/2011/07/welcome-brian-hazen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Utah Landlord Tenant Eviction Procedure</title>
		<link>http://btjd.com/2011/05/utah-landlord-tenant-eviction-procedure/</link>
		<comments>http://btjd.com/2011/05/utah-landlord-tenant-eviction-procedure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 16:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>skeppner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Utah Landlord Tenant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://btjd.elojasystems.com/?p=858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Utah eviction procedure is set forth in Utah Code Ann. Sec. 78B-6-801, et al.  The first step in the eviction process is to serve the tenant with a notice to pay or quit.  The type of lease determines the length of notice that must be given.  For example, if the lease is for a definite<a href="http://btjd.com/2011/05/utah-landlord-tenant-eviction-procedure/" class="read-more">Continue Reading</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Utah eviction procedure is set forth in <a title="Utah Eviction Procedure" href="http://le.utah.gov/~code/TITLE78B/htm/78B06_080100.htm">Utah  Code Ann. Sec. 78B-6-801</a>, et al.  The first step in the eviction  process is to serve the tenant with a notice to pay or quit.  The type  of lease determines the length of notice that must be given.  For  example, if the lease is for a definite amount of time, three days’  notice must be given.  If the tenant does not leave within the time  period specified in the notice, the landlord must then file a complaint  and serve the tenant with a three-day summons.  If the tenant fails to  file an answer, the next step is for the landlord to obtain an order of  restitution, signed by the court, and have it served by the county  sheriff.  If the tenant files an answer, the landlord may then request  an evidentiary hearing, to be held within 10 days of the request to  determine who may remain in possession of the property while the case is  pending.  The court has discretion to adjudicate all issues at the  hearing if it is deemed appropriate.  BTJD attorneys have experience in  pursuing and defending eviction claims in both residential and  commercial settings and are happy to assist you in navigating the  various issues surrounding such cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://btjd.com/2011/05/utah-landlord-tenant-eviction-procedure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Change in Accredited Investor Definition</title>
		<link>http://btjd.com/2011/04/change-in-accredited-investor-definition/</link>
		<comments>http://btjd.com/2011/04/change-in-accredited-investor-definition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 13:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bhawkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Definitions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://btjd.elojasystems.com/?p=423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Securities laws are meant to defend the defenseless. With that in mind, the definition of ‘accredited investor’ is a particularly important concept. The idea behind this definition is that persons having a high income or significant wealth have less need for protection of securities laws as compared to those less fortunate.  So under the most<a href="http://btjd.com/2011/04/change-in-accredited-investor-definition/" class="read-more">Continue Reading</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Securities laws are meant to defend the defenseless. With that in mind, the definition of ‘accredited investor’ is a particularly important concept. The idea behind this definition is that persons having a high income or significant wealth have less need for protection of securities laws as compared to those less fortunate.  So under the most generally available exemption from registration under securities laws, accredited investors are entitled to less disclosure than unaccredited investors.  For this reason, we generally encourage our clients to issue securities only to accredited investors. The burden of additional disclosures to be made to unaccredited investors is just too great.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The definition of ‘accredited investor’ recently changed in a significant way.  For an individual to qualify as an ‘accredited investor,’ he or she must satisfy either income or net worth standards. To meet the income standard, the investor must have income that exceeds $200,000 in each of the two most recent years or joint income with his or her spouse that exceeds $300,000 in each of those years, and have a reasonable expectation of reaching the same income level in the current year. If the investor&#8217;s income does not exceed these thresholds, he or she must alternatively satisfy the net worth standard.  In the past, the net worth standard depended on whether the investor has an individual net worth, or joint net worth with the investor’s spouse, at the time of the investment that exceeds $1,000,000. The value of the investor&#8217;s primary residence historically has been <strong>included</strong> as part of the individual&#8217;s net worth for purposes of determining whether the investor is accredited. With the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act, however, the value of the investor&#8217;s primary residence will be <strong>excluded</strong>.  This exclusion will make it more difficult for natural persons to qualify as accredited investors.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Issuers, investors and others that participate in private placement transactions should make sure that their disclosure documents, accredited investor questionnaires and subscription agreements are consistent with this new standard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://btjd.com/2011/04/change-in-accredited-investor-definition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pricing Stock Options</title>
		<link>http://btjd.com/2011/03/how-to-price-stock-options/</link>
		<comments>http://btjd.com/2011/03/how-to-price-stock-options/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 03:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bhawkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Options]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://btjd.clint.bz/?p=1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the good ol’ days, circa 2000, boards routinely granted options for common stock at deep discounts to the preferred price, as much as 90% of that preferred price. The business rationale for the discount is to give key service providers common stock at the lowest possible price so that they have the greatest incentive<a href="http://btjd.com/2011/03/how-to-price-stock-options/" class="read-more">Continue Reading</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the good ol’ days, circa 2000, boards routinely granted options for common stock at deep discounts to the preferred price, as much as 90% of that preferred price. The business rationale for the discount is to give key service providers common stock at the lowest possible price so that they have the greatest incentive to create value. And if the price is kept low, both the service provider and the company receive more ‘bang for the buck.’ The incentive effect of 10,000 options at $.10/share may be the same as 20,000 options at $1.00/share.  And the justification for the discount is that the preferred stock has extra bells and whistles as compared to common stock—most notably, liquidation preference, dividends, and antidilution protection—and so should be priced higher.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The good ol’ days are gone.  In 2004, the Internal Revenue Service promulgated Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, which, among other things, applies for valuing common stock for options.  Here’s what you’ll need to consider:</p>
<ul>
<li>The fair market value must be determined using “reasonable application of a reasonable valuation method.”</li>
<li>A valuation needs to be performed by someone who is qualified (based on their knowledge, training, experience, etc.).  In most cases, companies choose to hire outside appraisal firms to meet this requirement.</li>
<li>The valuation needs to be updated at least every 12 months, or more frequently if significant changes occur in the business between grant dates (such as new rounds of financing).</li>
<li>If your company fails to comply with 409A, your employees will be personally liable for immediate taxation – plus a 20 percent penalty tax, and potential interest payments.</li>
<li>And perhaps most importantly, potential investors and acquirers want to know that your company has complied with Section 409A.  The failure to comply with Section 409A can be a significant red flag to them.</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Many of our venture-financed clients elect to have third parties provide valuations for this purpose.  Of course, valuations take time and money.  A good valuation firm can do a valuation in a month’s time, and we see the costs of most good outside valuations for companies in our market ranging between $4,000 to $10,000.  For a fun (and even animated!) discussion around these issues, see  <a href="http://www.xtranormal.com/watch/7471325/" target="_blank">http://www.xtranormal.com/watch/7471325/</a>.  For a spirited and colorful discussion about why 409A is stupid, see <a href="http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2005/12/409a-government-maximus-interruptus.html">http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2005/12/409a-government-maximus-interruptus.html</a> and the posts that follow it. But remember: we as lawyers don’t make the rules, we’re just charged with advising you of them.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://btjd.com/2011/03/how-to-price-stock-options/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BTJD Welcomes Seasoned Litigator James K. Tracy to the Firm</title>
		<link>http://btjd.com/2011/02/btjd-welcomes-seasoned-litigator-james-k-tracy-to-the-firm/</link>
		<comments>http://btjd.com/2011/02/btjd-welcomes-seasoned-litigator-james-k-tracy-to-the-firm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://btjd.elojasystems.com/?p=430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BTJD is pleased to announce that seasoned litigator James K. Tracy has joined the firm as a partner. We are excited to share his expertise with our phenomenal clients and to add his experiences and specialties to the collective knowledge of the firm. To learn more about James and his expertise, click here to view<a href="http://btjd.com/2011/02/btjd-welcomes-seasoned-litigator-james-k-tracy-to-the-firm/" class="read-more">Continue Reading</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTJD is pleased to announce that seasoned litigator James K. Tracy has joined the firm as a partner. We are excited to share his expertise with our phenomenal clients and to add his experiences and specialties to the collective knowledge of the firm.</p>
<p>To learn more about James and his expertise, <a title="James K. Tracy" href="http://btjd.elojasystems.com/attorneys/james-k-tracy/">click here to view his bio</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://btjd.com/2011/02/btjd-welcomes-seasoned-litigator-james-k-tracy-to-the-firm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
